From: 2weiEmu <saalbach.robert@outlook.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:16:29 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: more rc
X-Git-Url: https://git.saalbach.dev/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0f3366792c6b9ebaacc01fa6b21075489f6be6be;p=research-obsidian.git

more rc
---

diff --git a/.obsidian/workspace.json b/.obsidian/workspace.json
index fed306f..ec9a116 100644
--- a/.obsidian/workspace.json
+++ b/.obsidian/workspace.json
@@ -11,10 +11,14 @@
             "id": "9da568e6f78dc7f8",
             "type": "leaf",
             "state": {
-              "type": "empty",
-              "state": {},
+              "type": "markdown",
+              "state": {
+                "file": "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md",
+                "mode": "source",
+                "source": false
+              },
               "icon": "lucide-file",
-              "title": "New tab"
+              "title": "RC Reading Response Week 4"
             }
           }
         ]
@@ -160,10 +164,10 @@
   },
   "active": "9da568e6f78dc7f8",
   "lastOpenFiles": [
+    "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Heinmiller -- Need for nonconformists -- GER -- 1958.pdf",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Cohen Cole -- 2014 -- The Creative American -- The open mind -- Cold War politics and the sciences of human nature.pdf",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Whyte -- Groupthink.pdf",
-    "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Heinmiller -- Need for nonconformists -- GER -- 1958.pdf",
     "PoC Research (Poster)/PoC Poster Overview.md",
     "Bundesverfassungsgericht/Urteil_des_Ersten_Senats_vom_5_November_2019.pdf",
     "Bundesverfassungsgericht/References on Bundesverfassungsgericht.md",
diff --git a/Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md b/Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md
index 857c12e..23ecaa6 100644
--- a/Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md	
+++ b/Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md	
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Argument:
 	- Society would collapse if people wouldn't conform.
 		- Conform to laws, business practices and acceptable manners in personal relations
 (Not sure I believe that thing above)
+Actually I think I do and I just misunderstood. Because while we might conform to the laws by action, we don't have to conform to them intellectually. That is what he is getting at, but alright.
 
 Argument:
 Intellectual conformity (in the strictest sense) "Rigid intellectual conformity" - without conviction (actual, grounded belief) - not good