]> git.example.dev Git - research-obsidian.git/commitdiff
more rc
author2weiEmu <saalbach.robert@outlook.de>
Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:16:29 +0000 (12:16 +0100)
committer2weiEmu <saalbach.robert@outlook.de>
Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:16:29 +0000 (12:16 +0100)
.obsidian/workspace.json
Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md

index fed306fcb47bcdcc9d8e90b695f7540ab6656331..ec9a116d601463f2cd54491d5100ce34707a114f 100644 (file)
             "id": "9da568e6f78dc7f8",
             "type": "leaf",
             "state": {
-              "type": "empty",
-              "state": {},
+              "type": "markdown",
+              "state": {
+                "file": "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md",
+                "mode": "source",
+                "source": false
+              },
               "icon": "lucide-file",
-              "title": "New tab"
+              "title": "RC Reading Response Week 4"
             }
           }
         ]
   },
   "active": "9da568e6f78dc7f8",
   "lastOpenFiles": [
+    "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Heinmiller -- Need for nonconformists -- GER -- 1958.pdf",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Cohen Cole -- 2014 -- The Creative American -- The open mind -- Cold War politics and the sciences of human nature.pdf",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/RC Reading Response Week 4.md",
     "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Whyte -- Groupthink.pdf",
-    "Recontextualising Creativity/RC Reading Responses/Reading Response Week 4/Heinmiller -- Need for nonconformists -- GER -- 1958.pdf",
     "PoC Research (Poster)/PoC Poster Overview.md",
     "Bundesverfassungsgericht/Urteil_des_Ersten_Senats_vom_5_November_2019.pdf",
     "Bundesverfassungsgericht/References on Bundesverfassungsgericht.md",
index 857c12eb3d99c152800cab1110d92cd1271fa3a5..23ecaa623cd6dc1f0fe00301d83f6935dbbdcb46 100644 (file)
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Argument:
        - Society would collapse if people wouldn't conform.
                - Conform to laws, business practices and acceptable manners in personal relations
 (Not sure I believe that thing above)
+Actually I think I do and I just misunderstood. Because while we might conform to the laws by action, we don't have to conform to them intellectually. That is what he is getting at, but alright.
 
 Argument:
 Intellectual conformity (in the strictest sense) "Rigid intellectual conformity" - without conviction (actual, grounded belief) - not good